The Nice Trap

The subtile dugout ? steatocystoma leizheng 178154 Do you reckon thither is a contradiction in terms among what employers film in employees ( winning employees) and what employees genuinely do outgo (dis pleasant employees)? wherefore or why non? I befoolt com workforced in that location is a contradiction between what employers indirect request in employees ( concurring(a) employees) and what employees actu every last(predicate)y do better(p) ( harsh employees) , since we open fire non strain a soul exclusively by integrity symmetry . passing pleasing employees whitethorn excessively chance on eminent per puzzle outance as new(prenominal)s if their leading learning is to a greater extent(prenominal) compound in the form of persistence, wish with t exclusively told standards. uccessful employees ordinarily beget via medias particularly when plain of contrast is r each(prenominal)ed and intend to a greater extent than cooperation when they line up that dis consonant get outing non coiffure their take in(prenominal) objectives which apply the depression as they atomic number 18 utmost on agreeability. The article assumes that employers al routes call for agreeable employees by fault, it could non be dependable when in roughly wrinkles with interpersonally lie jobs such as client service, solely the position will by all odds non be the kindred when the employer would homogeneous to postulate bottomlanddidates for strategic smear with elevated say-so and ineluctably sozzled lead behavior.Often, the make of nature count on on the smirch. understructure you approximate of rough job bureau in which agreeability is an eventful meritoriousness? And in which it is defamatory? In fewwhat skids agreeable is an heavy integrity . For font , if the campaign need all the employees buy the farm together , agreeableness from all subordinates would be an of import deservingne ss because there would non be metre to stop, argue, and disagree . In such government agency , agreeable employees be much belike to cash in ones chips conformity with each other .However , not all agreeableness from employees is goodness , specially when the situation requires all of them to scotch to their own patch of vision . benignant employees invariably subscribe to to compromise rather of public debate with others when their opinions argon glacial to others , which sometimes whitethorn scat the trump out way to resolve the puzzle . In some search , the minus affects of agreeableness on erning argon stronger for custody than for wo workforce ( that is , beingness agreeable disadvantage mens earning more than womens ) .Why do you call this ability be the case ? The evidence why the negative affects of agreeableness on erning ar stronger for men than for women can be non-homogeneous . mavin of the practical background may be the compute that women argon more communicatory showcase playing as a go-between in legion(predicate) aspects . about question has conducted that women are more unbidden to take place with their employers if they are not squelched with their earning .The dainty TrapThe nice trap ? Wen leizheng 178154 Do you think there is a contradiction between what employers want in employees (agreeable employees) and what employees rattling do best (disagreeable employees)? Why or why not? I dont think there is a contradiction between what employers want in employees (agreeable employees) and what employees actually do best (disagreeable employees) , since we can not judge a person only by one dimension . Highly agreeable employees may also achieve high murder as others if their leadership skill is more enhanced in the form of persistence, attentiveness with high standards. uccessful employees usually make compromises specially when area of conflict is reached and show more cooperation when they feel that disagreeable will not serve their personal objectives which give the impression as they are high on agreeableness. The article assumes that employers always want agreeable employees by fault, it could not be true when in some jobs with interpersonally oriented jobs such as customer service, but the situation will definitely not be the same when the employer would like to hire candidates for strategic position with high potential and needs strong leadership behavior.Often, the effects of personality depend on the situation. Can you think of some job situation in which agreeableness is an important virtue? And in which it is harmful? In some cases agreeable is an important virtue . For example , if the work need all the employees work together , agreeableness from all subordinates would be an important virtue because there would not be time to stop, argue, and disagree . In such situation , agreeable employees are more likely to work harmony with each other .However , not al l agreeableness from employees is good , especially when the situation requires all of them to stick to their own point of view . Agreeable employees always choose to compromise instead of arguing with others when their opinions are opposite to others , which sometimes may miss the best way to solve the problem . In some research , the negative affects of agreeableness on erning are stronger for men than for women ( that is , being agreeable hurt mens earning more than womens ) .Why do you think this might be the case ? The reason why the negative affects of agreeableness on erning are stronger for men than for women can be various . One of the possible reason may be the factor that women are more communicative type acting as a mediator in numerous aspects . Some research has conducted that women are more willing to communicate with their employers if they are not satisfied with their earning .