The Impractical Philosophies of Self-reliance and Civil Disobedience Es

The Impractical Philosophies of Self-reliance and Civil disobedience   The philosophies of Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson would do work well in a society comprised exactly of highly intellectual, healthy individuals who were bequeathing put forth the effort compulsory to thoroughly examine themselves and formulate their bear opinions about every return key pertaining to them. Emerson said that all(prenominal) members of society should think for themselves and formulate their own opinions kinda than conforming to a popular belief. Thoreau said that the best government was no government, and that people should always do what was just. A society that functioned under the ideals of Emerson and Thoreau would waste no problems. No bills would be take, because all members of society would do what was remunerate and help each other out. A farmer would revert away his grain and in return would receive everything he necessitate from other members of society. No crimes would be committed because people would think by means of what they were about to do and realize that a better option existed. Realistically, such(prenominal) a society is not possible because humans constantly catch mistakes, and since these ideals rest on the notion that all members of society will cling to them, the philosophies be not practical. Because humans could never fully adhere to them, the philosophies of Emerson and Thoreau will never be adopted in society.   The philosophy of Thoreau hinges on the sufferance and truth of the philosophy of Emerson, and the philosophy of Emerson is ruined if the philosophy of Thoreau cannot be followed. Emerson preached that all men should trust their own hearts, and that what they thought was good and true. To believe your own thought, to believe that ... ...s as the checks and balances for human neglect.   People have two straightforward natural hightail itencies. At heart, they tend to be good, but in performan ce they tend to be bad. People know the difference between right and wrong, but usually do not act on this knowledge. They tend to act too quickly, to give in to their desire for more money and more power, thinking that these will bring them happiness. People usually cave in to understand that true happiness lies in doing the right thing.   Self-reliance and civilised disobedience go hand in hand. If all people are self-reliant, then they can function with no government at all. yet if one man is not self-reliant and acts against his good nature, government is needed and thus self-reliance cannot fully function. In a perfect society, these ideals would work wonders. In flawed society they will accomplish nothing.